When evaluating investment options, looking out for the differences between Exchange Traded Funds and Listed Investment Companies is extremely important. Both, LIC vs ETF, offer their own unique advantages and cater to the varying investment needs. Here is a detailed comparison to help you make an informed decision.
Structure and management
LICs are investment companies with an active management investment vehicle listed on exchanges and with a fixed capital structure. They are designed to invest in a diversified portfolio of assets and to be actively managed by a fund manager who makes decisions on asset allocation and stock selection. LICs may trade at a premium or discount to their Net Asset Value.
On the other hand, the majority of ETFs are passively managed funds. Essentially, they track the performance of a particular index or sector. They strive to act in performance as close to their benchmark index as possible. Given the nature of ETFs, it is expected that they trade at prices around their NAV due to arbitrage and creation/redemption mechanisms, among others.
Trading and liquidity
ETFs are known for their high liquidity. They can be bought and sold throughout the trading day at market prices, thanks to their continuous trading of underlying securities. This liquidity is supported by the ETF’s structure, which facilitates easy entry and exit for investors.
LICs also trade on stock exchanges, but their liquidity can vary significantly. LICs might experience substantial premiums or discounts to their NAV, affecting the trading price and ultimately impacting investor returns. This variability can make LICs less predictable compared to ETFs.
Fees and expenses
When it comes to fees, ETFs have lower management fees compared to LICs. The reason for this is that ETFs are often passively managed, meaning they require less oversight and have lower operational costs. The lower fees are a direct benefit to investors, as it helps in maximizing overall returns.
Since LICs are actively managed investment companies, they usually charge higher management fees compared to the other alternatives. It is mainly because the fund managers would need to be involved in deciding the investment strategies and the associated asset allocation. This can reduce the net returns for investors at the end compared to more cost-effective ETFs.
Investment focus
The investment focus of LICs is much broader, for they can invest in various asset classes and sectors and include investments not covered by common indices. This gives LICs the flexibility to pursue a set of diverse strategies and potentially uncover undervalued opportunities that aren't available through standard indices.
In contrast, ETFs are designed for targeted exposures and track a certain index or sector. This approach very strongly links its performance to the chosen benchmark and gives investors a fairly simple way to gain exposure to a certain market segment or an asset class.
Transparency
ETFs generally provide greater transparency. They regularly update their holdings and performance data, often on a daily basis. This frequent updating allows investors to track their investments' performance and make informed decisions based on current data.
In contrast, LICs offer less frequent updates on their portfolio. This can make it more challenging for investors to monitor performance and understand asset allocation, as they receive less timely information compared to the transparent reporting of ETFs.
Performance and risk
ETFs are designed to match the performance of their underlying index, which provides predictable returns based on the index’s performance. This makes ETFs relatively stable and easier to gauge in terms of expected performance.
LICs, however, may either outperform or underperform their benchmarks depending on the effectiveness of the fund manager’s strategies. The performance of LICs is subject to active management decisions, which introduces a higher level of risk compared to the more predictable performance of ETFs.