EMH theory is a highly disputed and controversial theory in modern financial economics.
The full form of EMH theory is the Efficient Market Hypothesis. The proponents of the EMH theory believe that outsized risk-adjusted returns can be achieved only if investors rely on speculation or gather inside information.
Before learning about the efficient market hypothesis assumptions, types, and strategies, let’s check what EMH theory is.
What is efficient market hypothesis theory
The Efficient Market Hypothesis (EMH) posits that financial markets are "informationally efficient," meaning that asset prices reflect all available information at any given time. According to the EMH theory, it is impossible to consistently achieve higher returns than the average market return on a risk-adjusted basis, as any new information that could affect prices is quickly absorbed and reflected in the stock prices.
The EMH is categorised into three forms: weak, semi-strong, and strong. The weak form suggests that past price movements are reflected in current stock prices, while the semi-strong form asserts that all publicly available information is accounted for in stock prices. The strong form includes all information, both public and private.
Understanding the EMH full form helps investors recognize the limitations of using technical or fundamental analysis to predict future price movements. As a result, strategies such as market timing or stock picking may not yield consistent profits, leading many to favor passive investment strategies that align with the EMH theory. This paradigm has significant implications for investors, portfolio managers, and financial analysts, as it challenges the effectiveness of active management in an efficient market.
How does Efficient Market Hypothesis theory work
The Efficient Market Hypothesis (EMH) operates on the premise that financial markets are efficient in processing and reflecting information about asset prices. Essentially, this means that stock prices are always at their fair value, making it challenging for investors to purchase undervalued stocks or sell overvalued ones consistently. The theory suggests that any new information, whether it is economic data, company earnings, or geopolitical events, is quickly incorporated into stock prices.
The EMH theory divides the market efficiency into three distinct forms: weak, semi-strong, and strong. In the weak form, historical price movements and volume data cannot be used to predict future price changes, as all past information is already reflected in current prices. The semi-strong form asserts that stock prices adjust rapidly to publicly available information, making fundamental analysis ineffective in generating excess returns. The strong form goes a step further by claiming that even insider information cannot provide an advantage, as all information is already reflected in stock prices.
The implications of EMH are profound for investors. If markets are efficient, then active investment strategies—such as stock picking or market timing—are unlikely to outperform a passive investment approach over the long term. This understanding leads many investors to adopt passive index funds or diversified portfolios, aligning their strategies with the EMH theory. Ultimately, the theory emphasizes the importance of accepting market prices as the best indicators of value, highlighting the challenges faced by those attempting to beat the market consistently.
Impact of the EMH theory
The efficient markets hypothesis suggests that all available information is already reflected in stock prices. This makes it hard to consistently outperform the market. It must be noted that this theory has made index funds very popular. For those unaware, index funds aim to match the market’s performance rather than beat it.
Several investors who believe in EMH prefer these low-cost and passive investments. While investing, they don’t expect fund managers to do much better than the overall market.
Moreover, because the EMH also shows how tough it is to outperform the market consistently, those few fund managers who can do so become highly valued. In this case, investors are willing to pay more for their expertise. This has even led to a small group of highly respected fund managers who are in high demand despite the general trend towards passive investing.
Top 5 efficient market hypothesis assumptions
There are five major assumptions in EMH theory. Let us check them closely.
- All market players have perfect information and the market is efficient
All market participants are assumed to have all kinds of information regarding a stock. The theory also assumes that information is free and that all new information is available to all market players instantly. At a certain point in time, all available information is reflected in the prices of stocks. - Investors are rational
All investors are assumed to be rational decision-makers. Their sole aim is the maximization of their utility. FOMO or others don’t affect their decision-making capabilities. They are assumed to make decisions logically to maximise their utilities. - Zero transaction cost
EMH theory assumes that a trader or investor doesn’t have to pay any transaction cost (fee and tax) for buying or selling stocks. - Frictions in the market are absent
In the real world, many market restrictions can be seen. Some of the most common restrictions are trading impediments, borrowing constraints, short selling, and many more. However, the efficient market hypothesis assumes that the market is efficient and all market players can take any position freely and without any restriction. - Prices are determined randomly
The EMH theory believes that studying stock price patterns in the past can’t be used to predict any future price movement. This is because the theory hypothesises that stock prices are determined randomly. That’s why technical analysis to predict future prices is considered futile as per the efficient market hypothesis.
What are the different types of EMH theory?
There are 3 types of efficient market hypothesis:
1. Weak EMH
The Weak Efficient Market Hypothesis posits that all past trading information, including historical prices and trading volumes, is fully reflected in current stock prices. This means that technical analysis, which relies on historical price data to predict future movements, cannot consistently generate excess returns. Under the weak form, it is believed that price movements follow a random walk, indicating that past performance has no bearing on future results. Investors relying solely on past trends and patterns will find it challenging to outperform the market, as the market efficiently incorporates all available data. Consequently, proponents of the weak EMH argue that strategies based on historical price analysis are futile, and investors should instead focus on fundamental analysis or adopt a passive investment strategy.
2. Semi-Strong EMH
The Semi-Strong Efficient Market Hypothesis extends the weak form by asserting that all publicly available information is reflected in stock prices. This includes not only historical prices but also financial statements, news releases, economic indicators, and any other public disclosures. As a result, any new information is rapidly absorbed by the market, making it nearly impossible for investors to achieve abnormal returns through fundamental analysis. For instance, if a company announces positive earnings, the stock price will adjust almost instantaneously to reflect this new information, leaving no opportunity for profit. This form of EMH underscores the importance of information dissemination and highlights how quickly markets react to news. As a consequence, investors may find that relying on public information to make investment decisions often yields similar results to a passive investment approach, as markets are adept at pricing in information swiftly and accurately.
3. Strong EMH
The Strong Efficient Market Hypothesis takes the concept of market efficiency a step further by asserting that all information—both public and private—is fully reflected in stock prices. Under this hypothesis, even insider information, which is typically considered a valuable advantage, cannot provide an edge in achieving excess returns. This suggests that insiders cannot consistently outperform the market due to the market's efficiency in integrating all information into prices. The implications of the strong form are significant for investors, as it challenges the notion that any group of investors has superior information that can lead to consistent profits. However, critics of the strong EMH argue that it is unrealistic, as there are instances where insider trading can lead to substantial gains, thereby highlighting discrepancies in market efficiency. Overall, while the strong form represents an ideal state of market efficiency, its practicality and applicability in real-world scenarios continue to be subjects of debate among financial theorists and practitioners.
Is the efficient market hypothesis true
The EMH suggests that stock prices reflect all available information, and it is difficult to consistently outperform the market. However, real-world markets aren't always perfect, and whether EMH holds true depends on what evidence you consider. Below are some points in favour as well as against this theory:
In favour of efficient markets
Some studies show that predicting short-term stock prices is very challenging. This finding aligns with the idea that markets are efficient. As a result, trying to predict short-term movements doesn’t offer a reliable advantage.
Also, many professional fund managers struggle to consistently outperform market indexes. This again supports the notion that it’s tough to beat the market when prices already reflect all information.
Against efficient market
There are cases where stock prices don't seem to fully reflect all available information. Usually, this leads to the creation of “patterns” or “anomalies” that some investors can take advantage of. Also, these discrepancies create opportunities for investors to identify and profit from mispriced stocks.
Furthermore, behavioural finance, which studies how human psychology affects market decisions, suggests that emotions and biases can cause inefficiencies in the market. Additionally, financial crises, where stock prices rapidly rise or fall irrationally, strongly challenge the EMH theory.
Limitations of the Efficient Market Hypothesis
While the Efficient Market Hypothesis (EMH) provides a strong framework for understanding how information is reflected in asset prices, it is not without its limitations. Critics argue that the theory does not account for certain real-world market behaviors and anomalies that challenge the assumption of perfect efficiency.
1. Market crashes and speculative bubbles
One of the most significant criticisms of EMH is its inability to explain market crashes and speculative bubbles. According to EMH, asset prices should reflect all available information, yet history shows instances where prices deviate significantly from their intrinsic value. Events like the dot-com bubble and the 2008 financial crisis demonstrate how irrational exuberance can drive prices to unsustainable levels, followed by sudden market crashes. Such phenomena suggest that markets are not always perfectly efficient and that emotional factors, such as fear and greed, can cause dramatic price distortions.
2. Market anomalies
Market anomalies, such as the small-cap effect or the January effect, also present a challenge to EMH. These anomalies reveal patterns or trends that can be exploited for profit, contradicting the idea that all information is reflected in stock prices. For instance, studies have shown that small-cap stocks tend to outperform large-cap stocks over time, and stock prices often rise disproportionately in January. These anomalies indicate that there are certain inefficiencies within the market that EMH does not account for.
3. Investors have outperformed the market
Several prominent investors, such as Warren Buffett and Peter Lynch, have consistently outperformed the market over long periods. Their success undermines the core premise of EMH, which asserts that it is impossible to consistently beat the market using publicly available information. While EMH claims that abnormal returns are the result of luck rather than skill, the long-term success of these investors suggests otherwise, indicating that market inefficiencies can be exploited by savvy investors.
4. Behavioural economics
EMH assumes that investors are rational and always make decisions based on all available information. However, behavioral economics has shown that human behavior is often irrational. Psychological biases, such as overconfidence, herd mentality, and loss aversion, can lead investors to make decisions that deviate from market efficiency. Behavioral economics challenges the rational decision-making foundation of EMH, providing an alternative view that markets are influenced by cognitive biases and emotional factors, leading to inefficiencies.
EMH and investing strategies
The Efficient Market Hypothesis (EMH) significantly influences the choice of investing strategies. According to EMH, since all available information is already reflected in stock prices, attempting to beat the market through active stock picking or market timing is futile. As a result, investors may lean toward passive investing strategies, such as investing in index funds or exchange-traded funds (ETFs), which mirror the overall market performance.
EMH suggests that active strategies, involving extensive research and analysis, do not consistently lead to higher returns compared to passive approaches. However, not all investors follow this mindset. Many active investors believe that market inefficiencies exist, allowing opportunities for excess returns.
Ultimately, for proponents of EMH, the best approach is to invest in diversified portfolios with long-term horizons, keeping costs low, and avoiding attempts to capitalize on short-term market movements.
Key takeaways
- The EMH theory suggests that stock prices already reflect all available information, and they are fairly priced.
- According to EMH, stocks are always traded at their “fair value” based on all known information. Therefore, they are neither overpriced nor underpriced.
- Supporters of EMH believe it is hard to consistently outperform the market. Hence, it is better to invest in a low-cost and passive portfolio like an index fund.
- The critics of EMH argue that it is possible to beat the market because sometimes stocks are not priced accurately, and investors can take advantage of this mispricing.
Special considerations
Several supporters of the EMH argue that the market is unpredictable, and it is difficult for investors to consistently pick winning stocks. Instead, they suggest that investing in low-cost and passive portfolios like index funds or ETFs is a better strategy. That’s because these funds try to match the market’s overall performance rather than trying to outperform it. These funds better align with the idea that the market efficiently prices all available information.
Now, if we talk about a study (Active/ Passive Barometer) conducted by Morningstar in June 2019, it supports this view. The study compared the performance of active managers who try to outperform the market and are against passive index funds and ETFs. Over ten years, from June 2009 to June 2019, only 23% of active managers outperformed their passive counterparts.
Moreover, the study found better success rates for active managers in “foreign equity” and “bond funds” but lower success rates in U.S. large-cap funds. This suggests that, overall, passive investing delivers better results for most investors.
Furthermore, it is worth mentioning that even though some active managers do outperform passive funds at times, identifying these managers is challenging. The study also highlights that less than 25% of top-performing active managers can maintain their superior performance over time.
Again, this statistic clearly shows the difficulty of beating the market and supports the idea that most investors would fare better by sticking with passive investment strategies rather than trying to pick the few active managers who might succeed.
Final words
The proponents of the efficient market hypothesis (EHM) theory say that in the long run, most investors will get a return that is similar to the market performance. However, detractors say that the EHM proponents don’t consider the active investing scenario where investors can continuously include better-performing stocks in their portfolio to outperform the market. Most proponents of EHM theory suggest investors buy and hold stocks for the long term to gain profit, which is the same return as the market.
Are you planning to start investing in mutual funds? If you are looking for ideas to get started, you may explore the Bajaj Finserv Mutual Fund Platform. You may choose from 1000+ mutual fund schemes listed on the platform. To get closer to your financial goals, first compare mutual funds. Then use either the SIP Calculator or the Lumpsum calculator to calculate probable incomes. This will help you make the best investment decision.
