Section 270A of the Income Tax Act addresses under-reporting and misreporting of income by taxpayers to enhance accuracy and compliance in income declarations. This section imposes penalties for such actions, with a standard penalty of 50% of the tax due on under-reported income. For cases involving deliberate or fraudulent misreporting, the penalty rises sharply, ranging from 100% to 200% of the tax due. Section 270A acts as a strong deterrent against tax evasion, holding taxpayers accountable for accurate declarations. This measure reflects the government’s commitment to preventing fraudulent tax practices and promoting transparency. By implementing stringent penalties, the law encourages responsible taxpayer behaviour and supports the broader goal of reducing tax evasion.
In this article, we will talk about the specifics of Section 270A, exploring what constitutes under-reporting and misreporting of income. We will also discuss the penalties associated with these actions and the legal implications for taxpayers.
What is section 270A of the income tax act?
Section 270A of the Income Tax Act, introduced via the Finance Act of 2017, empowers the Assessing Officer (AO) to impose penalties on individuals who either underreport or misreport their income in their Income Tax Returns (ITRs). This section addresses discrepancies where reported income is less than the actual income or when incorrect information is provided regarding income sources or amounts. The aim is to ensure accurate tax reporting and to penalise non-compliance effectively.
Also read about: What is a Hindu Undivided Family
Key provisions of Section 270A
Section 270A of the Income Tax Act outlines penalties related to under-reporting and misreporting of income by taxpayers. Introduced to ensure greater tax compliance and curb income misreporting, this section imposes specific penalties based on the nature of the reporting inaccuracy.
For cases of under-reporting, where income is understated but not necessarily fraudulent, a penalty equal to 50% of the tax due on the unreported income is imposed. This encourages taxpayers to be cautious and accurate in their income declarations. In more severe cases involving misreporting, where taxpayers intentionally or fraudulently manipulate income figures, the penalties are harsher. Misreporting attracts a penalty between 100% to 200% of the tax due, serving as a powerful deterrent against intentional tax evasion.
Section 270A is carefully structured to differentiate between genuine mistakes and intentional fraud, reflecting a balanced approach by the government to enforce compliance without unduly punishing inadvertent errors. This provision underscores the government’s commitment to accountability and transparency in tax practices by reducing tax evasion and reinforcing responsible reporting. Through these measures, Section 270A promotes an equitable tax environment, encouraging taxpayers to act responsibly within the legal framework.
What is under reporting of income under section 270A?
Under-reporting of income refers to the scenario where a taxpayer declares less income than they actually earn. This could result from intentional deceit or errors in record-keeping. Key aspects include:
- Failure to disclose income: Omitting income from tax returns or books of account.
- Higher assessed income: When the Income Tax Department assesses income higher than what was declared.
- Non-filing penalties: Failure to file returns when income exceeds the basic exemption limit.
- Adjustments in income: Reporting adjustments that incorrectly reduce a loss or convert it into income.
Even minor inaccuracies or omissions can lead to penalties under Section 270A, highlighting the importance of precise and complete income reporting.
Also read about: What is direct tax code
What is misreporting of income under section 270A?
Misreporting of income involves providing incorrect information about the nature, source, or amount of income. This can include:
- Incorrect income classification: Misclassifying business income as capital gains or vice versa.
- False information: Providing inaccurate figures or claiming unsubstantiated expenses.
- Unreported transactions: Failing to include certain receipts or international transactions.
Penalty under section 270A of the income tax act
Penalties for non-compliance under Section 270A of the Income Tax Act are substantial and vary depending on whether the income has been under-reported or misreported. In cases of under-reporting, the penalty amounts to 50% of the tax due on the unreported income. However, for misreporting, where there is a deliberate intent to deceive, the penalty is much harsher, set at 200% of the tax due on the misreported income. These penalties are levied in addition to the tax liability on the income in question.
The differentiation between under-reporting and misreporting reflects the severity of the violation. While under-reporting may result from errors or oversight, misreporting is viewed as intentional misinformation aimed at evading taxes. The heavier penalty for misreporting underscores the government’s effort to deter taxpayers from engaging in fraudulent practices and reinforces the importance of accurate income declarations. Section 270A sends a clear message that while unintentional mistakes will be penalised, deliberate deceit will be met with far more severe consequences. This framework encourages greater compliance and ensures that the tax system remains fair, with stringent measures in place to prevent tax evasion.
Also read about: Difference Between Income Tax Act and Direct Tax Code
Examples of under-report and misreport income
Under-reported income:
- Failure to report certain income sources
Individuals may overlook reporting additional sources of income, such as interest from savings accounts or small freelance earnings. - Underestimating business revenue
Business owners might unintentionally report lower revenue due to accounting errors or failure to include all sales or contracts. - Incorrect deductions or exemptions
Claiming higher deductions or exemptions than allowed under tax laws can lead to under-reporting. For example, overclaiming expenses that were not fully incurred. - Excluding foreign income
Some taxpayers may forget to include income earned abroad, resulting in under-reporting. This is especially common in the case of foreign investments or employment.
Misreported income:
- Inflating expenses
Taxpayers may deliberately inflate business expenses to reduce taxable income. For instance, claiming personal expenses as business-related to lower tax liability. - False claims of deductions
This includes intentionally claiming deductions for which the taxpayer is not eligible, such as medical expenses that were not incurred. - Falsifying income sources
Deliberately hiding income by reporting it under non-taxable sources or showing a lower income bracket for tax savings is an example of misreporting. - Manipulating financial records
Altering sales records, income statements, or bank statements to show reduced income is a common practice of misreporting aimed at evading tax payments.
Calculation under section 270A of the income tax act with example
Under Section 270A, penalties are calculated based on the nature of the discrepancy—under-reporting or misreporting of income. For instance, consider Mr. Anil, who had a total income of Rs. 15 lakhs for the assessment year 2022-23. It was discovered that he underreported income by Rs. 5 lakhs and misreported income of Rs. 2 lakhs by claiming inadmissible expenses.
Under-reporting penalty calculation:
- Under-reported Income: Rs. 5 lakhs
- Tax Rate: 30%
- Penalty = 50% of tax due on under-reported income
- Tax Due: Rs. 5 lakhs × 0.30 = Rs. 1.5 lakhs
- Penalty: 0.5 × Rs. 1.5 lakhs = Rs. 75,000
Misreporting penalty calculation:
- Misreported Income: Rs. 2 lakhs
- Tax Rate: 30%
- Penalty = 200% of tax due on misreported income
- Tax Due: Rs. 2 lakhs × 0.30 = Rs. 60,000
- Penalty: 2 × Rs. 60,000 = Rs. 1,20,000
Thus, Mr. Anil’s total penalty under Section 270A amounts to Rs. 75,000 (under-reporting) + Rs. 1,20,000 (misreporting) = Rs. 1,95,000, in addition to the tax owed on the discrepancies.
Also read about: What is dearness allowance
Who can impose a penalty under section 270A?
Under Section 270A of the Income Tax Act, the Assessing Officer (AO), Commissioner (Appeals), or the Principal Commissioner can impose penalties for under-reporting or misreporting of income. These authorities are empowered to review the taxpayer’s income declarations and determine if discrepancies exist. If under-reporting or misreporting is found, they can levy penalties based on the severity of the violation. The penalty imposed varies, with under-reporting attracting a 50% penalty and misreporting leading to a 200% penalty. These authorities ensure tax compliance and enforce the law by penalising non-compliant taxpayers.
Exceptions to section 270A
- Genuine mistakes: Penalties may be waived if discrepancies arise from genuine errors or misunderstandings, provided the taxpayer has made a good faith effort to comply with tax laws.
- Voluntary disclosure: If a taxpayer voluntarily discloses under-reported or misreported income before the assessment, the penalties may be reduced or entirely waived as part of the government's encouragement for self-correction.
- Legal provisions: In some cases, other sections of the Income Tax Act may override Section 270A, offering alternative penalty structures or relief in specific circumstances. These provisions may provide exceptions or reduced penalties depending on the situation.
- Fraudulent intent: Exceptions do not apply in cases where there is clear evidence of fraudulent intent or deliberate attempts to evade taxes. In such cases, penalties under Section 270A are more severe, ranging from 100% to 200% of the tax due.
These exceptions ensure that Section 270A is not overly harsh for taxpayers who are genuinely trying to comply with tax laws, while still holding those with fraudulent intent accountable. The provisions balance the need for compliance with fairness in the application of penalties.
Also read about: What is an inheritance tax
Examples of under-report and misreport income
Under-report income:
- Example 1: An individual earns Rs. 12 lakhs but reports only Rs. 10 lakhs in their tax return, underreporting by Rs. 2 lakhs.
- Example 2: A business fails to disclose Rs. 50,000 in income from side activities, reducing their total reported income.
Misreport income:
- Example 1: A person classifies Rs. 1 lakh of business income as capital gains to reduce tax liability, misreporting the nature of income.
- Example 2: An individual claims Rs. 20,000 in business expenses without proper receipts or documentation, misreporting their expenses.
Conclusion
Section 270A is crucial for maintaining tax compliance and ensuring transparency in income reporting. It imposes significant penalties for under-reporting and misreporting, thereby encouraging accurate and honest tax submissions. Taxpayers must be diligent in their reporting, keep meticulous records, and seek professional advice if needed. While the penalties are severe, they are intended to deter non-compliance and reinforce the importance of accurate tax reporting and integrity in the financial system.
With over 1000 mutual fund schemes listed on the Bajaj Finserv Platform, users have the flexibility to choose from a broad spectrum of funds tailored to their financial goals and risk appetite along with the option to compare and calculate. The platform’s user-friendly interface and advanced tools make investing easier and more transparent, enabling investors to make informed decisions and manage their portfolios effectively. Whether you are looking to start investing or expand your existing portfolio, the Bajaj Finserv Platform provides the resources and support you need to achieve your investment objectives.
